↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive routine diagnostic screening to identify predictive mutations, gene amplifications, and microsatellite instability in FFPE tumor material
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12885-020-06785-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabeth M. P. Steeghs, Leonie I. Kroeze, Bastiaan B. J. Tops, Leon C. van Kempen, Arja ter Elst, Annemiek W. M. Kastner-van Raaij, Sandra J. B. Hendriks-Cornelissen, Mandy J. W. Hermsen, Erik A. M. Jansen, Petra M. Nederlof, Ed Schuuring, Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg, Astrid Eijkelenboom

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,695,859
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,216
of 8,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,988
of 373,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#77
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,445 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.