↓ Skip to main content

The male germ cell gene regulator CTCFL is functionally different from CTCF and binds CTCF-like consensus sites in a nucleosome composition-dependent manner

Overview of attention for article published in Epigenetics & Chromatin, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The male germ cell gene regulator CTCFL is functionally different from CTCF and binds CTCF-like consensus sites in a nucleosome composition-dependent manner
Published in
Epigenetics & Chromatin, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-8935-5-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Sleutels, Widia Soochit, Marek Bartkuhn, Helen Heath, Sven Dienstbach, Philipp Bergmaier, Vedran Franke, Manuel Rosa-Garrido, Suzanne van de Nobelen, Lisa Caesar, Michael van der Reijden, Jan Christian Bryne, Wilfred van IJcken, J Anton Grootegoed, M Dolores Delgado, Boris Lenhard, Rainer Renkawitz, Frank Grosveld, Niels Galjart

Abstract

CTCF is a highly conserved and essential zinc finger protein expressed in virtually all cell types. In conjunction with cohesin, it organizes chromatin into loops, thereby regulating gene expression and epigenetic events. The function of CTCFL or BORIS, the testis-specific paralog of CTCF, is less clear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 112 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 28%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,820,055
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#277
of 567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,191
of 164,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.