You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Knowledge and interactions of the local community with the herpetofauna in the forest reserve of Quininí (Tibacuy-Cundinamarca, Colombia)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13002-020-00370-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juan Camilo Ríos-Orjuela, Nelson Falcón-Espitia, Alejandra Arias-Escobar, María José Espejo-Uribe, Carol Tatiana Chamorro-Vargas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 2 | 22% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 56% |
Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 7% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 21% |
Unknown | 27 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 14% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 36 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,511,573
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#182
of 740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,953
of 375,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.