↓ Skip to main content

How do the experiences and beliefs of adults and children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia influence their adherence to treatment? A systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do the experiences and beliefs of adults and children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia influence their adherence to treatment? A systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0793-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona J. Kinnear, Rachel Perry, Aidan Searle, Julian P. Hamilton-Shield, Fiona E. Lithander

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Psychology 6 8%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 25 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,839,765
of 17,444,955 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#597
of 1,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,523
of 280,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,444,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them