| Title |
Prognosis when using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for critically ill COVID-19 patients in China: a retrospective case series
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-2840-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yingchun Zeng, Zhongxiang Cai, Yunyan Xianyu, Bing Xiang Yang, Ting Song, Qiaoyuan Yan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 12% |
| Mexico | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 5 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 16% |
| Scientists | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 232 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 19% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 20% |
| Unknown | 58 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 67 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#531,086
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#333
of 6,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,916
of 404,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#11
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.