↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 611)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
368 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
572 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1546 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salomone Di Saverio, Mauro Podda, Belinda De Simone, Marco Ceresoli, Goran Augustin, Alice Gori, Marja Boermeester, Massimo Sartelli, Federico Coccolini, Antonio Tarasconi, Nicola de’ Angelis, Dieter G. Weber, Matti Tolonen, Arianna Birindelli, Walter Biffl, Ernest E. Moore, Michael Kelly, Kjetil Soreide, Jeffry Kashuk, Richard Ten Broek, Carlos Augusto Gomes, Michael Sugrue, Richard Justin Davies, Dimitrios Damaskos, Ari Leppäniemi, Andrew Kirkpatrick, Andrew B. Peitzman, Gustavo P. Fraga, Ronald V. Maier, Raul Coimbra, Massimo Chiarugi, Gabriele Sganga, Adolfo Pisanu, Gian Luigi de’ Angelis, Edward Tan, Harry Van Goor, Francesco Pata, Isidoro Di Carlo, Osvaldo Chiara, Andrey Litvin, Fabio C. Campanile, Boris Sakakushev, Gia Tomadze, Zaza Demetrashvili, Rifat Latifi, Fakri Abu-Zidan, Oreste Romeo, Helmut Segovia-Lohse, Gianluca Baiocchi, David Costa, Sandro Rizoli, Zsolt J. Balogh, Cino Bendinelli, Thomas Scalea, Rao Ivatury, George Velmahos, Roland Andersson, Yoram Kluger, Luca Ansaloni, Fausto Catena

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 368 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,546 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1546 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 259 17%
Student > Postgraduate 125 8%
Other 104 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 79 5%
Student > Master 73 5%
Other 197 13%
Unknown 709 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 627 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 1%
Unspecified 17 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 <1%
Other 77 5%
Unknown 739 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 312. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#111,477
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#1
of 611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,849
of 404,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.