Validity of EQ-5D utility index and minimal clinically important difference estimation among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, March 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 61 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 15 X posts from 12 X users, with an upper bound of 32,264 followers.

RT @icurehab: Validity of EQ-5D utility index and minimal clinically important difference estimation among patients with chronic obstructiv…

06 Jun 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @icurehab: Validity of EQ-5D utility index and minimal clinically important difference estimation among patients with chronic obstructiv…

05 Jun 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @icurehab: Validity of EQ-5D utility index and minimal clinically important difference estimation among patients with chronic obstructiv…

05 Jun 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

Validity of EQ-5D utility index and minimal clinically important difference estimation among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease https://t.co/QsgwP5HCGq #icurehab #A2Fbundle

05 Jun 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 11 additional X posts.