You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Between funder requirements and ‘jobbing scientists’: the evolution of patient and public involvement in a mental health biomedical research centre - a qualitative study
Research Involvement and Engagement, April 2020
Joanne Evans, Stan (Constantina) Papoulias
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||14||67%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||10%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||5||15%|
|Student > Master||4||12%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||4||12%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||2||6%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,457,056 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
of 452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 377,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,457,056 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.