↓ Skip to main content

Impact of nationwide enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care (PACAP-1): a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of nationwide enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care (PACAP-1): a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-020-4180-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. M. Mackay, F. J. Smits, A. E. J. Latenstein, A. Bogte, B. A. Bonsing, H. Bos, K. Bosscha, L. A. A. Brosens, L. Hol, O. R. C. Busch, G. J. Creemers, W. L. Curvers, M. den Dulk, S. van Dieren, L. M. J. W. van Driel, S. Festen, E. J. M. van Geenen, L. G. van der Geest, D. J. A. de Groot, J. W. B. de Groot, N. Haj Mohammad, B. C. M. Haberkorn, J. T. Haver, E. van der Harst, G. J. M. Hemmink, I. H. de Hingh, C. Hoge, M. Y. V. Homs, N. C. van Huijgevoort, M. A. J. M. Jacobs, E. D. Kerver, M. S. L. Liem, M. Los, H. Lubbinge, S. A. C. Luelmo, V. E. de Meijer, L. Mekenkamp, I. Q. Molenaar, M. G. H. van Oijen, G. A. Patijn, R. Quispel, L. B. van Rijssen, T. E. H. Römkens, H. C. van Santvoort, J. M. J. Schreinemakers, H. Schut, T. Seerden, M. W. J. Stommel, A. J. ten Tije, N. G. Venneman, R. C. Verdonk, J. Verheij, F. G. I. van Vilsteren, J. de Vos-Geelen, A. Vulink, C. Wientjes, F. Wit, F. J. Wessels, B. Zonderhuis, C. H. van Werkhoven, J. E. van Hooft, C. H. J. van Eijck, J. W. Wilmink, H. W. M. van Laarhoven, M. G. Besselink

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 40 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 40 48%