You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Constructing osteoarthritis through discourse – a qualitative analysis of six patient information leaflets on osteoarthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-8-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janet C Grime, Bie Nio Ong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,347,842
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#693
of 4,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,706
of 76,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.