↓ Skip to main content

Impact on quality of life and safety of sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy in children with severe house dust mite and pollen-associated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact on quality of life and safety of sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy in children with severe house dust mite and pollen-associated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13601-020-00315-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Proctor, Elodie Morrough, Otto Fenske, Sarah Allatt, Stephen M. Hughes, Vibha Sharma, Peter D. Arkwright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,395,168
of 17,704,521 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#154
of 516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,980
of 283,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,704,521 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them