You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Daily cost of consumer food wasted, inedible, and consumed in the United States, 2001–2016
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00552-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zach Conrad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 40% |
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
Scientists | 8 | 32% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Researcher | 7 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 50 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 20% |
Unknown | 56 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 331. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#98,314
of 25,047,899 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#38
of 1,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,170
of 378,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,047,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.