You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How an electronic health record became a real-world research resource: comparison between London’s Whole Systems Integrated Care database and the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-020-1082-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Bottle, Carole Cohen, Amanda Lucas, Kavitha Saravanakumar, Zia Ul-Haq, Wayne Smith, Azeem Majeed, Paul Aylin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 53% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 23% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 41 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,498,838
of 24,696,958 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#66
of 2,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,249
of 377,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,696,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.