↓ Skip to main content

Differences in socioeconomic and gender inequalities in tobacco smoking in Denmark and Sweden; a cross sectional comparison of the equity effect of different public health policies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in socioeconomic and gender inequalities in tobacco smoking in Denmark and Sweden; a cross sectional comparison of the equity effect of different public health policies
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frida Eek, Per-Olof Östergren, Finn Diderichsen, Niels K Rasmussen, Ingelise Andersen, Kontie Moussa, Mathias Grahn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 25%
Social Sciences 15 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Psychology 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,265,672
of 23,203,401 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,793
of 15,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,233
of 165,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#17
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,203,401 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.