↓ Skip to main content

Rapid, easy, and cheap randomization: prospective evaluation in a study cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid, easy, and cheap randomization: prospective evaluation in a study cohort
Published in
Trials, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa J Parker, Asmaa Manan, Mark Duffett

Abstract

When planning a randomized controlled trial (RCT), investigators must select randomization and allocation procedures based upon a variety of factors. While third party randomization is cited as being among the most desirable randomization processes, many third party randomization procedures are neither feasible nor cost-effective for small RCTs, including pilot RCTs. In this study we present our experience with a third party randomization and allocation procedure that utilizes current technology to achieve randomization in a rapid, reliable, and cost-effective manner.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 27%