| Title |
Managing COVID-19 in resource-limited settings: critical care considerations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02890-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wen Ting Siow, Mei Fong Liew, Babu Raja Shrestha, Faisal Muchtar, Kay Choong See |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 18% |
| South Africa | 2 | 18% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | 9% |
| Burundi | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 230 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 16% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 22% |
| Unknown | 55 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 59 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,806,432
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,884
of 6,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,071
of 404,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#97
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.