↓ Skip to main content

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 13. Applicability, transferability and adaptation

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 13. Applicability, transferability and adaptation
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-4-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Holger J Schünemann, Atle Fretheim, Andrew D Oxman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Peru 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 128 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 45 31%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 48%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 23 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,397,991
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#703
of 1,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,936
of 170,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.