You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review and taxonomy of tools for evaluating evidence-based medicine teaching in medical education
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01311-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bharathy Kumaravel, Jasmine Heath Hearn, Leila Jahangiri, Rachel Pollard, Claire J. Stocker, David Nunan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 50% |
| Scientists | 10 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,166,283
of 23,203,401 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#377
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,400
of 376,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#10
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,203,401 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.