You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The associations of sugar-sweetened, artificially sweetened and naturally sweet juices with all-cause mortality in 198,285 UK Biobank participants: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01554-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jana J. Anderson, Stuart R. Gray, Paul Welsh, Daniel F. Mackay, Carlos A. Celis-Morales, Donald M. Lyall, John Forbes, Naveed Sattar, Jason M. R. Gill, Jill P. Pell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 8 | 19% |
| India | 6 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
| Japan | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Morocco | 1 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,325,267
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#919
of 4,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,672
of 406,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#30
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.