↓ Skip to main content

Nudging New York: adaptive models and the limits of behavioral interventions to reduce no-shows and health inequalities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nudging New York: adaptive models and the limits of behavioral interventions to reduce no-shows and health inequalities
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05097-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Ruggeri, Tomas Folke, Amel Benzerga, Sanne Verra, Clara Büttner, Viktoria Steinbeck, Susan Yee, Krisda Chaiyachati

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 24 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Psychology 7 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Design 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 26 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,063,823
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#274
of 8,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,044
of 382,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#5
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.