↓ Skip to main content

Examining assumptions regarding valid electronic monitoring of medication therapy: development of a validation framework and its application on a European sample of kidney transplant patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examining assumptions regarding valid electronic monitoring of medication therapy: development of a validation framework and its application on a European sample of kidney transplant patients
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-8-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kris Denhaerynck, Petra Schäfer-Keller, James Young, Jürg Steiger, Andreas Bock, Sabina De Geest

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 6 10%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 40%
Psychology 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,130,037
of 24,384,776 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,175
of 2,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,063
of 83,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,384,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.