↓ Skip to main content

Attention bias modification: the Emperor's new suit?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attention bias modification: the Emperor's new suit?
Published in
BMC Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul MG Emmelkamp

Abstract

A series of primarily laboratory-based studies found attention bias modification in socially anxious participants to lead to reduced anxiety. It is argued that the failure to replicate the positive results of attention bias modification in the study of Carlbring et al. may be due to reasons other than the application through the Internet. A number of controlled studies failed to replicate the positive effects of attention bias modification in clinically rather than subclinically socially anxious subjects. Given the lack of robust evidence for attention bias modification in clinically socially anxious individuals, the author is inclined to consider attention bias modification as 'the Emperor's new suit'. Results achieved with regular Internet-based treatments for social anxiety disorder based on cognitive therapy and exposure methods are much better than those achieved with attention bias modification procedures delivered 'face to face' in clinically distressed participants. Given the lack of robust evidence for attention bias modification in clinical samples, there is no need yet to investigate the implementation of attention bias modification through the Internet.Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/12/66.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 166 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 25%
Researcher 30 17%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 108 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 33 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,023,912
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,341
of 3,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,292
of 164,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#19
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.