You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barriers and facilitators to implementing bubble CPAP to improve neonatal health in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Health Reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40985-020-00124-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Celia R. Walker, Tamanda Hiwa, Marianne Vidler, Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando, Queen Dube, David M. Goldfarb, Kondwani Kawaza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Malawi | 1 | 10% |
| Kenya | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 60 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 62 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,319,923
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#91
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,999
of 408,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.