You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alterations in vitamin D status and anti-microbial peptide levels in patients in the intensive care unit with sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-7-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leo Jeng, Alexandra V Yamshchikov, Suzanne E Judd, Henry M Blumberg, Gregory S Martin, Thomas R Ziegler, Vin Tangpricha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 52 | 28% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 47 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,555,398
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,837
of 4,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,453
of 94,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.