You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The limitations to our understanding of peer review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-020-00092-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan P. Tennant, Tony Ross-Hellauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 204 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 12% |
| Germany | 11 | 5% |
| France | 7 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Austria | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 77 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 143 | 70% |
| Scientists | 41 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 214 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 21% |
| Unknown | 77 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 26% |
| Unknown | 88 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#242,110
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#8
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,089
of 410,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them