You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A scoping review and proposed workflow for multi-omic rare disease research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-020-01376-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katie Kerr, Helen McAneney, Laura J. Smyth, Caitlin Bailie, Shane McKee, Amy Jayne McKnight |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Comoros | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,281,318
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#743
of 3,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,972
of 408,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#9
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.