You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The cost-effectiveness of preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-9-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mira Johri, Denis Ako-Arrey |
| Abstract |
Although highly effective prevention interventions exist, the epidemic of paediatric HIV continues to challenge control efforts in resource-limited settings. We reviewed the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This article presents syntheses of evidence on the costs, effects and cost-effectiveness of HIV MTCT strategies for LMICs from the published literature and evaluates their implications for policy and future research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 16% |
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 7% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,656,194
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#50
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,980
of 194,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them