↓ Skip to main content

Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science Communications, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 559)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
108 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
469 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice
Published in
Implementation Science Communications, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s43058-020-00023-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna C. Moullin, Kelsey S. Dickson, Nicole A. Stadnick, Bianca Albers, Per Nilsen, Sarabeth Broder-Fingert, Barbara Mukasa, Gregory A. Aarons

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 469 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 469 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 15%
Student > Master 64 14%
Researcher 56 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 4%
Other 75 16%
Unknown 150 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 13%
Social Sciences 44 9%
Psychology 33 7%
Engineering 15 3%
Other 75 16%
Unknown 174 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#616,356
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#4
of 559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,749
of 409,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.