↓ Skip to main content

Defining and conceptualizing outcomes for de-implementation: key distinctions from implementation outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science Communications, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 490)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Defining and conceptualizing outcomes for de-implementation: key distinctions from implementation outcomes
Published in
Implementation Science Communications, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s43058-020-00035-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth Prusaczyk, Taren Swindle, Geoffrey Curran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Professor 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Psychology 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 16 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,451,118
of 24,593,959 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#29
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,046
of 380,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,593,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.