↓ Skip to main content

Number of consulting medical institutions and risk of polypharmacy in community-dwelling older people under a healthcare system with free access: a cross-sectional study in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Number of consulting medical institutions and risk of polypharmacy in community-dwelling older people under a healthcare system with free access: a cross-sectional study in Japan
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05205-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshiki Suzuki, Masao Iwagami, Shota Hamada, Tomoyuki Matsuda, Nanako Tamiya

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 22 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Unspecified 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,093,603
of 23,866,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,835
of 7,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,817
of 379,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#151
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,866,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.