↓ Skip to main content

Chemical stability study of vitamins thiamine, riboflavin, pyridoxine and ascorbic acid in parenteral nutrition for neonatal use

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemical stability study of vitamins thiamine, riboflavin, pyridoxine and ascorbic acid in parenteral nutrition for neonatal use
Published in
Nutrition Journal, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela O Ribeiro, Daniela C Pinto, Luis Mauricio TR Lima, Nádia M Volpato, Lúcio M Cabral, Valéria P de Sousa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Master 19 12%
Researcher 17 11%
Other 9 6%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 34 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 29 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 40 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,610,424
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#935
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,070
of 111,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#24
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.