↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Three-dimensional assessment of coronary high-intensity plaques with T1-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to predict periprocedural myocardial injury after elective…

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Three-dimensional assessment of coronary high-intensity plaques with T1-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to predict periprocedural myocardial injury after elective percutaneous coronary intervention
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12968-020-00620-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayato Hosoda, Yasuhide Asaumi, Teruo Noguchi, Yoshiaki Morita, Yu Kataoka, Fumiyuki Otsuka, Kazuhiro Nakao, Masashi Fujino, Toshiyuki Nagai, Michikazu Nakai, Kunihiro Nishimura, Atsushi Kono, Yoshiaki Komori, Tomoya Hoshi, Akira Sato, Tomohiro Kawasaki, Chisato Izumi, Kengo Kusano, Tetsuya Fukuda, Satoshi Yasuda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Decision Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#20,934,339
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,197
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,289
of 408,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.