↓ Skip to main content

Lay-therapist-delivered, low-intensity, psychosocial intervention for refugees and asylum seekers (PROSPER): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lay-therapist-delivered, low-intensity, psychosocial intervention for refugees and asylum seekers (PROSPER): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-020-04310-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Rawlinson, Rabeea’h W. Aslam, Girvan Burnside, Anna Chiumento, Malena Eriksson-Lee, Amy Humphreys, Naila Khan, Daniel Lawrence, Rachel McCluskey, Annette Mackinnon, Lois Orton, Atif Rahman, Ewan Roberts, Anna Rosala-Hallas, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Philomene Uwamaliya, Ross G. White, Eira Winrow, Christopher Dowrick

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 44 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 46 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,363,009
of 19,396,073 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#884
of 5,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,929
of 290,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,396,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them