↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
347 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: A systematic review
Published in
Critical Care, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc7160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilian Minne, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Evert de Jonge

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 331 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 58 17%
Student > Master 53 15%
Student > Postgraduate 40 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 9%
Other 31 9%
Other 86 25%
Unknown 47 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 222 64%
Computer Science 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Engineering 9 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 1%
Other 31 9%
Unknown 59 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,678,204
of 15,028,834 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,847
of 4,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,036
of 166,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,028,834 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them