↓ Skip to main content

Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, March 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2415-4-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther M Hoffmann, Franz-H Grus, Norbert Pfeiffer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 27%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 14%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 51%
Engineering 10 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,610,760
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#374
of 2,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,198
of 58,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them