↓ Skip to main content

Orthodontic traction of impacted canine using magnet: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Cases Journal, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Orthodontic traction of impacted canine using magnet: a case report
Published in
Cases Journal, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1757-1626-1-382
Pubmed ID
Authors

Larry CF Li, Ricky WK Wong, Nigel M King

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 30%
Student > Master 5 19%
Other 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 8 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,077,666
of 21,769,404 outputs
Outputs from Cases Journal
#67
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,125
of 297,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cases Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,769,404 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them