You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing three approaches for involving patients in research prioritization: a qualitative study of participant experiences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-020-00196-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle C. Lavallee, Sarah O. Lawrence, Andrew L. Avins, David R. Nerenz, Todd C. Edwards, Donald L. Patrick, Zoya Bauer, Anjali R. Truitt, Sarah E. Monsell, Mary R. Scott, Jeffrey G. Jarvik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 43% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 66% |
| Scientists | 9 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,988,933
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#180
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,145
of 413,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.