You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A critical time window for the analgesic effect of central histamine in the partial sciatic ligation model of neuropathic pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neuroinflammation, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12974-016-0637-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jie Yu, Ying-Ying Tang, Ran-Ran Wang, Guo-Dong Lou, Ting-Ting Hu, Wei-Wei Hou, Jia-Xing Yue, Hiroshi Ohtsu, Li-Yun Shi, Shi-Hong Zhang, Zhong Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 11% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,610,760
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,236
of 2,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,368
of 353,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#26
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.