↓ Skip to main content

Circulating cancer stem cell markers in breast carcinomas: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circulating cancer stem cell markers in breast carcinomas: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13643-017-0660-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maryam Mansoori, Zahra Madjd, Leila Janani, Arezoo Rasti

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,226,575
of 16,414,025 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#950
of 1,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,309
of 279,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,414,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them