You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circulating cancer stem cell markers in breast carcinomas: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-017-0660-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maryam Mansoori, Zahra Madjd, Leila Janani, Arezoo Rasti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,610,760
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,320
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,993
of 441,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#38
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.