| Title |
COVID-19: where is the national ethical guidance?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00478-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Huxtable |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 30% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 26% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,627,695
of 25,339,932 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#274
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,939
of 384,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,339,932 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.