You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Prognostic importance of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability for micro- and macrovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: The Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study
Cardiovascular Diabetology, May 2020
Claudia R. L. Cardoso, Nathalie C. Leite, Gil F. Salles
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||10||19%|
|Student > Master||7||13%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||15||28%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||4||7%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||2%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 379,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.