You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using GPS technology to (re)-examine operational definitions of ‘neighbourhood’ in place-based health research
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-072x-11-22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bryan J Boruff, Andrea Nathan, Sandra Nijënstein |
Abstract |
Inconsistencies in research findings on the impact of the built environment on walking across the life course may be methodologically driven. Commonly used methods to define 'neighbourhood', from which built environment variables are measured, may not accurately represent the spatial extent to which the behaviour in question occurs. This paper aims to provide new methods for spatially defining 'neighbourhood' based on how people use their surrounding environment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 2% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 173 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 22% |
Researcher | 31 | 17% |
Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
Other | 35 | 19% |
Unknown | 28 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 39 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 16 | 9% |
Computer Science | 9 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Other | 52 | 28% |
Unknown | 44 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2012.
All research outputs
#8,856,191
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#310
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,888
of 180,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.