↓ Skip to main content

Human resources for maternal, newborn and child health: from measurement and planning to performance for improved health outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human resources for maternal, newborn and child health: from measurement and planning to performance for improved health outcomes
Published in
Human Resources for Health, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-9-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neeru Gupta, Blerta Maliqi, Adson França, Frank Nyonator, Muhammad A Pate, David Sanders, Hedia Belhadj, Bernadette Daelmans

Abstract

There is increasing attention, globally and in countries, to monitoring and addressing the health systems and human resources inputs, processes and outputs that impede or facilitate progress towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals for maternal and child health. We reviewed the situation of human resources for health (HRH) in 68 low- and middle-income countries that together account for over 95% of all maternal and child deaths.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 277 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 18%
Researcher 51 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 67 23%
Unknown 49 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 33%
Social Sciences 43 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 5%
Unspecified 14 5%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 58 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,415,054
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#410
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,715
of 127,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.