↓ Skip to main content

A pragmatic method for costing implementation strategies using time-driven activity-based costing

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A pragmatic method for costing implementation strategies using time-driven activity-based costing
Published in
Implementation Science, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-00993-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zuleyha Cidav, David Mandell, Jeffrey Pyne, Rinad Beidas, Geoffrey Curran, Steven Marcus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 10 5%
Professor 9 4%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 81 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Psychology 11 5%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 87 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,632,164
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#298
of 1,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,678
of 387,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.