You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A pragmatic method for costing implementation strategies using time-driven activity-based costing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-00993-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zuleyha Cidav, David Mandell, Jeffrey Pyne, Rinad Beidas, Geoffrey Curran, Steven Marcus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 11 | 50% |
Members of the public | 7 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
Researcher | 19 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 5% |
Professor | 9 | 4% |
Other | 38 | 19% |
Unknown | 81 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
Psychology | 11 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
Other | 42 | 21% |
Unknown | 87 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,632,164
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#298
of 1,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,678
of 387,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.