You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence and determinants of the dangerous selfie among medical and nursing students: a cross-sectional study from eastern India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-08785-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Priyamadhaba Behera, Arvind Kumar Singh, Vikas Bhatia, P. S. Preeti, Rishav Kumar, Satyajeet Das, Rupesh Tholia, Ritajyoti Ghosh, Sandeep Kumar, K. S. Safiya, Rojismita Purohit, Raman Bansal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,815,079
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,216
of 15,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,280
of 382,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#111
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.