You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
T 1 mapping performance and measurement repeatability: results from the multi-national T 1 mapping standardization phantom program (T1MES)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00613-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriella Captur, Abhiyan Bhandari, Rüdiger Brühl, Bernd Ittermann, Kathryn E. Keenan, Ye Yang, Richard J. Eames, Giulia Benedetti, Camilla Torlasco, Lewis Ricketts, Redha Boubertakh, Nasri Fatih, John P. Greenwood, Leonie E.M. Paulis, Chris B. Lawton, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, Hildo J. Lamb, Richard Steeds, Steve W. Leung, Colin Berry, Sinitsyn Valentin, Andrew Flett, Charlotte de Lange, Francesco DeCobelli, Magalie Viallon, Pierre Croisille, David M. Higgins, Andreas Greiser, Wenjie Pang, Christian Hamilton-Craig, Wendy E. Strugnell, Tom Dresselaers, Andrea Barison, Dana Dawson, Andrew J. Taylor, François-Pierre Mongeon, Sven Plein, Daniel Messroghli, Mouaz Al-Mallah, Stuart M. Grieve, Massimo Lombardi, Jihye Jang, Michael Salerno, Nish Chaturvedi, Peter Kellman, David A. Bluemke, Reza Nezafat, Peter Gatehouse, James C. Moon, on behalf of the T1MES Consortium |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 15% |
| Australia | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 28% |
| Engineering | 11 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,899,682
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#309
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,164
of 416,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.