You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2020 update of the WSES guidelines for the management of acute colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13017-020-00313-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Massimo Sartelli, Dieter G. Weber, Yoram Kluger, Luca Ansaloni, Federico Coccolini, Fikri Abu-Zidan, Goran Augustin, Offir Ben-Ishay, Walter L. Biffl, Konstantinos Bouliaris, Rodolfo Catena, Marco Ceresoli, Osvaldo Chiara, Massimo Chiarugi, Raul Coimbra, Francesco Cortese, Yunfeng Cui, Dimitris Damaskos, Gian Luigi de’ Angelis, Samir Delibegovic, Zaza Demetrashvili, Belinda De Simone, Francesco Di Marzo, Salomone Di Saverio, Therese M. Duane, Mario Paulo Faro, Gustavo P. Fraga, George Gkiokas, Carlos Augusto Gomes, Timothy C. Hardcastle, Andreas Hecker, Aleksandar Karamarkovic, Jeffry Kashuk, Vladimir Khokha, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Kenneth Y. Y. Kok, Kenji Inaba, Arda Isik, Francesco M. Labricciosa, Rifat Latifi, Ari Leppäniemi, Andrey Litvin, John E. Mazuski, Ronald V. Maier, Sanjay Marwah, Michael McFarlane, Ernest E. Moore, Frederick A. Moore, Ionut Negoi, Leonardo Pagani, Kemal Rasa, Ines Rubio-Perez, Boris Sakakushev, Norio Sato, Gabriele Sganga, Walter Siquini, Antonio Tarasconi, Matti Tolonen, Jan Ulrych, Sannop K. Zachariah, Fausto Catena |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 14% |
| Mexico | 8 | 11% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Colombia | 4 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Italy | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 395 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 14% |
| Other | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 7% |
| Researcher | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 65 | 16% |
| Unknown | 138 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 196 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Unknown | 156 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#562,268
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#13
of 621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,474
of 418,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.