↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of patient-oriented interventions to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review of patient-oriented interventions to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections
Published in
Systematic Reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-01359-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sameh Mortazhejri, Patrick Jiho Hong, Ashley M. Yu, Brian Younho Hong, Dawn Stacey, R. Sacha Bhatia, Jeremy M. Grimshaw

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 24 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 30%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 25 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,304,871
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#381
of 2,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,488
of 415,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#9
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.