You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systematic review of patient-oriented interventions to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01359-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sameh Mortazhejri, Patrick Jiho Hong, Ashley M. Yu, Brian Younho Hong, Dawn Stacey, R. Sacha Bhatia, Jeremy M. Grimshaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Brazil | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 30% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 25 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,304,871
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#381
of 2,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,488
of 415,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#9
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.