↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Critical Care, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/cc3483
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Lee Hough, J Randall Curtis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 21%
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Psychology 3 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#11,484,747
of 17,687,978 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,326
of 5,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,956
of 285,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,687,978 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them