↓ Skip to main content

Do people living in disadvantaged circumstances receive different mental health treatments than those from less disadvantaged backgrounds?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
34 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do people living in disadvantaged circumstances receive different mental health treatments than those from less disadvantaged backgrounds?
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-08820-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clarissa Giebel, Rhiannon Corcoran, Mark Goodall, Niall Campbell, Mark Gabbay, Konstantinos Daras, Ben Barr, Tim Wilson, Cecil Kullu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 31 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 36 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#697,675
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#700
of 17,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,354
of 419,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#21
of 421 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 421 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.